Back to Search Start Over

Postoperative Liver Failure Criteria for Predicting Mortality after Major Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection.

Authors :
Kawamura, Takeshi
Noji, Takehiro
Okamura, Keisuke
Tanaka, Kimitaka
Nakanishi, Yoshitsugu
Asano, Toshimichi
Ebihara, Yuma
Kurashima, Yo
Nakamura, Toru
Murakami, Soichi
Tsuchikawa, Takahiro
Shichinohe, Toshiaki
Hirano, Satoshi
Source :
Digestive Surgery. Mar2019, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p158-165. 8p. 7 Charts.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (Hx with EBDR) that may cause severe morbidity and even death. The purpose of this study was to compare several criteria systems as predictors of PHLF-related mortality following Hx with EBDR for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Methods: The study cohort consisted of 222 patients who underwent Hx with EBDR for PHCC. We compared several criteria systems, including previously established criteria (the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criterion; and the "50-50" criterion), and our institution's novel systems "Max T-Bili" defined as total bilirubin (T-Bili) >7.3 mg/dL during post-operative days (POD) 1–7, and the "3-4-50" criterion, defined as total bilirubin >4 mg/dL and prothrombin time <50% on POD #3. Results: Thirteen patients (5.8%) died from PHLF-related causes. The 3-4-50 criterion showed high positive predictive values (39.1%), the 3-4-50, Max T-Bili, and 50-50 criterion showed high accuracies (91.7, 86.9, and 90.5%, respectively) and varying sensitivities (69.2, 69.2, and 38.5% respectively). Conclusions: The 3-4-50, Max T-Bili, and 50-50 criterion were all useful for predicting PHLF-related mortality after Hx with EBDR for PHCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02534886
Volume :
36
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Digestive Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134866777
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000486906