Don't pass the automated vehicles!: System level impacts of multi-vehicle CAV control strategies.

Highlights • Coordination heuristics reduce emissions more than single vehicle optimization. • CAV control strategies can increase non-CAV vehicle emissions. • CAV control strategies increase passing maneuvers in non-CAV vehicles. • CAV control strategies used at low penetration rates increase system emissions. • CAV control strategies used at high penetration rates reduce system emissions. Abstract With increasing number of vehicles registered on road the CO 2 emissions and the amount of fuel wasted because of congestion has been rising. V2X and Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) technology allows vehicles and traffic infrastructure to communicate with each other, and could facilitate better use of existing resources by providing vehicles information about their surroundings and traffic signals. The information regarding the phase of traffic signal, vehicles' position and vehicles' speed can be used by drivers and autonomous vehicle control algorithms to make informed decisions as they approach traffic signals. This research proposes a coordination heuristic to improve traffic flow of CAV vehicles through traffic signals and reduce system wide emissions. A simulation was used to compare the system level impacts to emissions, travel time, and wait time of the proposed coordination heuristic to a single vehicle optimization strategy and baseline driver behavior. The results of this research suggest that traffic density and CAV market penetration impact the potential benefits of CAV control strategies. At low CAV penetration rates both the single vehicle and coordination heuristic produced increased emissions primarily driven by driving behavior of non-V2X enabled vehicles. At higher CAV penetration rates the coordination heuristic significantly outperformed the single vehicle control strategy and baseline driver behavior with regards to emissions reduction. The analysis indicates that at 900 vehicles per hour for either of the two driving strategies: coordination heuristic or single-vehicle optimization, to be more preferred over baseline driver behavior, at least 50% of the vehicles should be CAV. Once a threshold penetration rate of CAV vehicles is achieved, vehicles following the coordination heuristic generate nearly 10% fewer CO 2 emissions than vehicles following baseline driver behavior, a 30% improvement over the reduction in CO 2 emissions obtained using single-vehicle optimization. The vehicles following the coordination heuristic also have less travel time than vehicles following single-vehicle optimization, and less wait times than vehicles following baseline driver behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]