Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a Test Dose Strategy for Pharmacokinetically-Guided Busulfan Dosing for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors :
Davis, Jessica M.
Ivanova, Anastasia
Chung, Yunro
Shaw, J. Ryan
Rao, Kamakshi V.
Ptachcinski, Jonathan R.
Sharf, Andrew A.
Serody, Jonathan S.
Armistead, Paul M.
Wood, William A.
Coghill, James M.
Jamieson, Katarzyna J.
Vincent, Benjamin G.
Riches, Marcie L.
Shea, Thomas C.
Alexander, Maurice D.
Source :
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation. Feb2019, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p391-397. 7p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Highlights • Using a busulfan test dose and pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing improves target area under the curve (AUC) attainment. • PK-guided dosing achieved target AUC in more patients compared with weight-based dosing. • There was less interpatient variability in AUC with PK-guided dosing. • Confirmatory first-dose PK analysis is necessary to adjust busulfan doses. • No associations between busulfan AUC and toxicity, death, or relapse were identified. ABSTRACT Targeted busulfan dosing helps limit chemotherapy-related toxicity and optimize disease outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). The objective of this study was to evaluate busulfan exposure from a pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing strategy using a test dose. This retrospective evaluation included adult patients who underwent HCT at our institution with busulfan-based myeloablative (>9 mg/kg) conditioning between January 2014 and October 2015. A weight-based test dose of 0.8 mg/kg was used with PK assessments to predict area under the curve (AUC pred) achieved with weight-based dosing, with a target AUC of 4800 µM*minute (AUC target). PK from the test dose was then used to calculate a PK-guided first myeloablative busulfan dose. PK assessments were also done after the first dose to assess if the goal area under the curve (AUC) had been achieved (AUC first). A PK-guided first dose resulted in achievement of target AUC with target ranges of ±10% in 50% of patients, ±15% in 75%, and ±20% in 94%. This was an improved rate of target achievement compared with the 33%, 44%, and 63% of patients who achieved the desired AUC for these respective target ranges when using weight-based dosing (P =.12,.004, and <.001, respectively). The PK-guided strategy also decreased the variability of AUC from 3.6-fold in AUC pred from the weight-based test doses (2700.8 to 9631 µM*minute; SD, 1211.6 µM*minute) to 1.8-fold in AUC first from the PK-guided first doses (3672.1 to 6609.8 µM*minute; SD, 574.7 µM*minute). This reflects a 2-fold improvement in AUC variability with a PK-guided dosing strategy. This is also improved from the 3-fold variability in AUC reported in other studies. Weight and body surface area were significantly associated with the likelihood of AUC first being within the ±10% target range (P =.04 for both associations). There was no significant association between AUC first and death, relapse, or a composite of the two. These results demonstrate a significant improvement in target AUC attainment and less interpatient variability with PK-guided dosing using a test dose strategy compared with weight-based dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10838791
Volume :
25
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134152420
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.017