Back to Search Start Over

Post-marketing surveillance study of the safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion or noninfectious posterior segment uveitis.

Authors :
Tufail, Adnan
Lightman, Sue
Kamal, Ahmed
Pleyer, Uwe
Paniagua, Nuria María Gajate
Dot, Corrine
Li, Xiao-Yan
Jiao, Jenny
Lou, Jean
Hashad, Yehia
Source :
Clinical Ophthalmology. Dec2018, Vol. 12, p2519-2534. 16p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in patients treated for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or noninfectious posterior segment uveitis (NIPSU) in clinical practice. Patients and methods: Multicenter (102 sites in France, Germany, Spain, UK), prospective, observational, post-authorization safety study in adult patients treated with DEX. Data collected up to 2 years after enrollment included serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESIs; adverse drug reactions that are considered important risks associated with DEX and listed in the European Union Ozurdex Risk Management Plan). Results: Overall, 803 patients (652 RVO, 151 NIPSU) received on-study DEX treatment, and 73.1% completed 24 months of follow-up; 72.6% were DEX-naïve. Median number of on-study injections per treated eye was 2 (range, 1–7); median reinjection interval was 27.1 weeks. Nonocular SAEs affected 9.5% of patients; none were considered DEX-related. Ocular SAEs (most common: cataract progression) occurred in 3.2% of treated eyes. SAEs were similar in eyes stratified by previous DEX use and number of on-study DEX injections (≤2 or >2), in both RVO and NIPSU. The most common AESIs were cataract formation and progression (20.0% and 19.2% of treated phakic eyes, n=551), increased intraocular pressure (19.0% of treated eyes), and vitreous hemorrhage (3.3% of treated eyes). Cataract progression was more frequent in baseline phakic eyes that were previously treated with DEX or received >2 on-study DEX injections. Conclusion: The long-term safety profile of DEX was acceptable. No new safety concerns were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11775467
Volume :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134122966
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S181256