Wheat leaf rust detection at canopy scale under different LAI levels using machine learning techniques.

Highlights • Addressing the effects of different LAI values on the accuracy of the selected machine learning methods in retrieval of wheat leaf rust severity level. • Provide separate wavelength ranges with the highest contributions in the wheat leaf rust inversion model at the three LAI levels. Abstract Accurate diagnosis of wheat leaf rust is of high interest for precision farming. Spectral data have been increasingly employed to detect this disease at leaf or canopy scales; however, less attention has been paid to the variations of leaf area index (LAI). Therefore, in this study, identification of wheat leaf rust was investigated at canopy scale and under different LAI levels, namely high, medium and low. Four machine learning (ML) methods including ν -support vector regression (ν -SVR), boosted regression trees (BRT), random forests regression (RFR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were built to estimate disease severity (DS) levels at canopy scale, where the reflectance data were measured in field situ by using a spectroradiometer, in which records spectra from 350 to 2500 nm. Results showed that ν -SVR outperformed the other ML methods at all three LAI levels with the R 2 measures all being around 0.99. The results, particularly, showed that the performances of the ML methods were improved with increasing LAI value, where RFR reported the worst R 2 value of 0.79 (RMSE = 8.5%) at low LAI level. The variable importance obtained using BRT showed three distinct regions of wavelengths that were appropriate across different LAI levels. The results of this research confirmed that hyperspectral signature can be reliably considered to identify wheat leaf rust disease at different LAI levels. Moreover, performances of several spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) were compared with those of the ML techniques. The results showed that the SVIs were consistently outperformed by the ML methods, particularly at low LAI level in which the SVIs were adversely affected. Nevertheless, all the SVIs, except for the RVSI, performed moderately well at high and medium LAI levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]