Back to Search Start Over

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Nonoperative Pelvic Fractures.

Authors :
Hamidi, Mohammad
Zeeshan, Muhammad
Sakran, Joseph V.
Kulvatunyou, Narong
O'Keeffe, Terence
Northcutt, Ashley
Zakaria, El Rasheid
Tang, Andrew
Joseph, Bellal
Source :
Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Jan2019, Vol. 228 Issue 1, p89-97. 9p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Patients with pelvic fractures are prone to venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications. Recent literature shows superiority of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopaedic operations. The aim of our study was to compare in-hospital outcomes for DOACs vs LMWH in patients with nonoperative pelvic fractures.<bold>Study Design: </bold>We performed a 2-year (2015 to 2016) analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database. We included all adult patients with isolated blunt pelvic fractures who were managed nonoperatively and received thromboprophylaxis with either LMWH or DOACs (Factor-Xa inhibitor or direct thrombin inhibitor). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on receipt of DOACs vs LMWH and were propensity-score-matched in a 1:2 ratio to control for possible confounding factors. Primary outcomes were deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Secondary outcomes were pRBC transfusions, intervention for hemorrhage control, and in-hospital mortality after initiation of thromboprophylaxis.<bold>Results: </bold>We identified 20,692 patients with pelvic fractures. There were 7,312 patients with isolated pelvic fractures included, 852 of whom were matched (DOACs: 284; LMWH: 568). Mean age was 43.2 ± 15 years, median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range 10 to 18). Matched groups were similar in demographics, vital signs, injury parameters, and timing of initiation of thromboprophylaxis. Overall, 5.2% of patients had DVT, 1.4% PE, and 1.3% died. Patients who received DOACs were less likely to develop DVT (1.8% vs 6.9%, p < 0.01) compared with LMWH. There was no difference in PE (p = 0.85) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.79) between the 2 groups. Similarly, there was no difference in post-prophylaxis blood transfusion, and post-prophylaxis intervention for hemorrhage control.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In patients with nonoperative pelvic fractures, DOACs were associated with a reduced rate of DVT vs LMWH without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. No association was found between the type of thromboprophylactic agent and rates of PE or in-hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10727515
Volume :
228
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
133554424
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.023