Cite
A rebuttal in defence of misinterpretation of the Galea et al. 2016 paper entitled “Pollution monitoring for sea salt aerosols and other anionic species at Hagar Qim Temples, Malta: a pilot study”.
MLA
Grima, Matthew, et al. “A Rebuttal in Defence of Misinterpretation of the Galea et Al. 2016 Paper Entitled ‘Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols and Other Anionic Species at Hagar Qim Temples, Malta: A Pilot Study.’” Heritage Science, vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2018, p. 1. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0236-8.
APA
Grima, M., Galea, M., & DeBattista, R. (2018). A rebuttal in defence of misinterpretation of the Galea et al. 2016 paper entitled “Pollution monitoring for sea salt aerosols and other anionic species at Hagar Qim Temples, Malta: a pilot study.” Heritage Science, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0236-8
Chicago
Grima, Matthew, Mario Galea, and Roslyn DeBattista. 2018. “A Rebuttal in Defence of Misinterpretation of the Galea et Al. 2016 Paper Entitled ‘Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols and Other Anionic Species at Hagar Qim Temples, Malta: A Pilot Study.’” Heritage Science 6 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s40494-018-0236-8.