Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness and feasibility of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Lin, Lu-Lu
Li, Yong-Ting
Tu, Jian-Feng
Yang, Jing-Wen
Sun, Ning
Zhang, Shuai
Wang, Tian-Qi
Shi, Guang-Xia
Du, Yi
Zhao, Jing-Jie
Xiong, Da-Chang
Hou, Hai-Kun
Liu, Cun-Zhi
Source :
Clinical Rehabilitation. Dec2018, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p1666-1675. 10p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture for pain relief and function improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis and to determine the feasibility of an eight-week acupuncture intervention. Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three teaching hospitals in China. Subjects: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren grade II or III). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to an eight-week (three sessions per week) intervention of either traditional Chinese acupuncture or sham acupuncture. Main measures: The primary outcome was response rate—the proportion of patients achieving score ⩾36% decrease in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function at week 8 compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes included pain, function and quality of life. Results: Of 42 patients randomized, 36 (85.7%) completed the study. There was no significant difference in response rate between the traditional Chinese acupuncture and control groups: 61.9% (13 of 21) versus 42.9% (9 of 21) achieved score ⩾36% decrease in WOMAC pain and function at week 8 (P = 0.217). The sum of WOMAC pain and function scores at week 8 was 11.6 (9.1) in the traditional Chinese acupuncture group compared with 16.3 (10.9) in the control group (P = 0.183). There was no significant difference between groups. Three adverse events were recorded and were classified as mild. Conclusion: It showed that three sessions per week acupuncture intervention of knee osteoarthritis was feasible and safe. No difference was observed between groups due to small sample size. Larger (sample size ⩾ 296) randomized controlled trials of this intervention appear justified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02692155
Volume :
32
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
133291968
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518790632