Back to Search
Start Over
Geochemistry and geochronology of gabbros from the Asa Ophiolite, Tibet: Implications for the early Cretaceous evolution of the Meso-Tethys Ocean.
- Source :
-
Lithos . Nov2018, Vol. 320, p192-206. 15p. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Abstract The formation of the Shiquanhe–Namco Ophiolite Mélange Zone (SNMZ) and its relationship to the Bangong–Nujiang Suture Zone (BNSZ) in central Tibet are key to understanding the Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Meso-Tethys Ocean. This study presents zircon U Pb geochronological, whole-rock geochemical, and Lu Hf isotopic data for gabbros from the Asa Ophiolite of the central SNMZ. Four gabbros yielded zircon U Pb ages of 117.3 ± 0.6, 117.3 ± 0.5, 115.3 ± 0.5, and 114.9 ± 0.6 Ma. Whole-rock geochemical analyses indicate that these rocks are tholeiitic, enriched in light rare earth and large-ion lithophile elements, and depleted in Nb and Ta. These gabbros have geochemical affinities to island arc and mid-ocean ridge basalts, suggesting that they originated in an oceanic back-arc basin. Whole-rock geochemical data and isotopically juvenile εHf(t) values suggest that the gabbros were derived from a depleted mantle source that was enriched by slab-derived fluids and partial melts of sediment. Our data, combined with previous work, suggest that the BNSZ records the Early Cretaceous subduction of the Meso-Tethys oceanic crust and that the SNMZ represents a back-arc basin. During the Early Cretaceous, the Meso-Tethys Ocean remained open and contained an intra-oceanic subduction system and back-arc basin. Highlights • Ophiolite has Early Cretaceous ages (114-118 Ma). • Ophiolite has an oceanic back-arc spreading ridge setting. • The Bangon-Nujiang Meso-Tethys Ocean remained open during the Early Cretaceous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00244937
- Volume :
- 320
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Lithos
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 133189076
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2018.09.013