Back to Search Start Over

Early FAST Examinations during Resuscitation May Compromise Trauma Outcomes.

Authors :
KLEINMAN, JOHN
KENJI INABA
POTT, EMILY
KAZUHIDE MATSUSHIMA
DEMETRIADES, DEMETRIOS
STRUMWASSER, AARON
Inaba, Kenji
Matsushima, Kazuhide
Source :
American Surgeon. Oct2018, Vol. 84 Issue 10, p1705-1709. 5p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Focused assessment with Sonography for trauma (FAST) examination is essential to trauma triage. We sought to determine whether FASTs completed early in sequencing portend worse outcomes. A two-year review (2014-2015) of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center was performed. Patients were matched at baseline and FAST times were compared. Outcomes included resuscitation time (RESUS-h), ventilation days (d), hospital length of stay (HLOS-d), ICU length of stay (LOS-d), survival (%), nosocomial infection rate (%), and venous thromboembolism complication rate (%). ED interventions included transfusions, crystalloid, antibiotics, central line placement, intubation, thoracostomy, thoracotomy, pelvic X-ray, and binder. One thousand, three hundred and twelve patients were included for analysis (mean age = 38 ± 19 years, mean Injury Severity Score = 12 ± 11, 21% penetrating). Compared with FASTs completed after the primary survey, early FASTs led to significantly more ventilation days (P < 0.01), longer ICU length of stay (P < 0.01), and a greater incidence of nosocomial infections (P = 0.03). In the ED, early FASTs led to significantly more intubations (P < 0.01) and transfusions (P < 0.01) compared with late FASTs. FASTs completed before primary survey portend worse outcomes, with more ED interventions and equivocal results. FAST as a true adjunct to primary survey is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00031348
Volume :
84
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Surgeon
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
132944695
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481808401034