Geological controls on the heterogeneous hydrocarbon compositions of the biodegraded Grosmont Formation bitumen, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin.

Highlights • The Grosmont Formation hosts heavy to severely biodegraded bitumen. • Degradation-resistant biomarkers are remarkably consistent laterally and vertically. • Degradable biomarker distributions are highly variable and profiles offset by shales. • Compartmentalization impacts degradation systematics in hopanes and 25-norhopanes. • C 31 –C 33 22R hopanes degrade prior to C 31 –C 33 22S hopanes. Abstract The hydrocarbon composition of the Grosmont Formation bitumen was investigated in 51 core samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The bitumen composition is highly variable and is heavily to severely biodegraded. Molecular ratios based on biodegradation-resistant compounds are highly uniform laterally and vertically, even across shale barriers indicating the bitumens are genetically related. Biodegradation-resistant biomarker maturity parameters suggests the bitumen was likely sourced during the early oil window stage of petroleum generation. Biomarkers responding to biodegradation display strong lateral and vertical variations in composition with geochemical profiles based on concentration data, displaying dramatic offsets when shales are present indicating the reservoir units are compartmentalised. Considering the relationship between 25-norhopanes and hopanes, the hydrocarbon composition data indicate progressive hopane degradation, both with concomitant formation of 25-norhopanes and hopane degradation without the formation of 25-norhopanes. In wells 07-08-085-18W4 and 10-12-093-24W4, the degradation of hopanes occurs in Upper Grosmont unit 3 (UG3) without the formation of 25-norhopanes (unless 25-norhopanes have been synchronously consumed), whereas in unit UG2, hopane degradation occurs with the concomitant formation of the 25-norhopanes. Therefore, the shale compartmentalizes the reservoir creating two isolated environments whereby the biogeochemical setting contributing to 25-norhopane formation is found in the UG2 unit, whereas it is absent or inactive in unit UG3. The degradation of the 22R epimer prior to the 22S epimer in the C 31 –C 33 17α-hopanes was recognized in well 16-05-088-19W4, which indicates that the consortia of microbes more readily biodegraded the epimer having the biological conformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]