Uranium and Cesium sorption to bentonite colloids under carbonate-rich environments: Implications for radionuclide transport.

Abstract In the context of geological disposal of radioactive waste, one of the controlling mechanisms for radionuclide migration through subsurface strata is sorption to mobile colloidal bentonite particles. Such particles may erode from the repository backfill or bentonite buffer and yield measurable (0.01–0.1 g/L) concentrations in natural groundwater. The extent of sorption is influenced by colloid concentration, ionic strength, radionuclide concentration, and the presence of competing metals. Uranium (VI) and cesium sorption to bentonite colloids was investigated both separately and together in low ionic strength (2.20 mM) artificial rainwater (ARW) and high ionic strength (169 mM) artificial groundwater (AGW; representative of a fractured carbonate rock aquitard). Sorption experiments were conducted as a factor of colloid concentration, initial metal concentration and opposing metal presence. It was shown that both U(VI) and Cs sorption were significantly reduced in AGW in comparison to ARW. Additionally, the sorption coefficient K d of both metals was found to decrease with increasing colloid concentration. Competitive sorption experiments indicated that at high colloid concentration (1–2 g/L), Cs sorption was reduced in the presence of U(VI), and at low colloid concentration (0.01–0.5 g/L), both Cs and U(VI) K d s were reduced when they were present together due to competition for similar sorption sites. The results from this study imply that in brackish carbonate rock aquifers, typical of the Israeli northern Negev Desert, both U(VI) and Cs are more likely to be mobile as dissolved species rather than as colloid-associated solids. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Highlights • Batch experiments determined sorption of U(VI) and Cs under environmental conditions. • Experiments show sorption in high salinity groundwater and low salinity rainwater. • K d for both elements increased with decreasing colloid concentration. • Presence of U(VI) reduced Cs sorption to bentonite surfaces, and vice versa. • Transport models should account for colloid concentration and competitive sorption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]