Back to Search Start Over

Embedding shared decision-making in the care of patients with severe and enduring mental health problems: The EQUIP pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

Authors :
Lovell, Karina
Bee, Penny
Brooks, Helen
Cahoon, Patrick
Callaghan, Patrick
Carter, Lesley-Anne
Cree, Lindsey
Davies, Linda
Drake, Richard
Fraser, Claire
Gibbons, Chris
Grundy, Andrew
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Meade, Oonagh
Roberts, Chris
Rogers, Anne
Rushton, Kelly
Sanders, Caroline
Shields, Gemma
Walker, Lauren
Source :
PLoS ONE. 8/22/2018, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p1-17. 17p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Severe mental illness is a major driver of worldwide disease burden. Shared decision-making is critical for high quality care, and can enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, it has not been translated into routine practice. This reflects a lack of evidence on the best way to implement shared decision-making, and the challenges of implementation in routine settings with limited resources. Our aim was to test whether we could deliver a practical and feasible intervention in routine community mental health services to embed shared decision-making for patients with severe mental illness, by improving patient and carer involvement in care planning. Methods: We cluster randomised community mental health teams to the training intervention or usual care, to avoid contamination. Training was co-delivered to a total of 350 staff in 18 teams by clinical academics, working alongside patients and carers. The primary outcome was the Health Care Climate Questionnaire, a self-report measure of ‘autonomy support’. Primary and secondary outcomes were collected by self-report, six months after allocation. Findings: In total, 604 patients and 90 carers were recruited to main trial cohort. Retention at six months was 82% (n = 497). In the main analysis, results showed no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between the intervention and usual care at 6 months (adjusted mean difference -0.064, 95% CI -0.343 to 0.215, p = 0.654). We found significant effects on only 1 secondary outcome. Conclusions: An intervention to embed shared decision-making in routine practice by improving involvement in care planning was well attended and acceptable to staff, but had no significant effects on patient outcomes. Enhancing shared decision-making may require considerably greater investment of resources and effects may only be apparent over the longer term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
13
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
131361497
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201533