Back to Search Start Over

The Intertemporal Tradeoff in Mobilizing Support for War.

Authors :
Huff, Connor
Schub, Robert
Source :
International Studies Quarterly. Jun2018, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p396-409. 14p. 2 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

How do leaders’ statements about conflict duration affect public support for their handling of war? We build on two disparate strands of prior research to theorize how approval depends on perceptions of both war's expected value and of the leader themself. The information available for making these evaluations changes over time. The public relies on elite cues in early stages of war. Cues predicting a short conflict mobilize support. As conflict unfolds, the actual conditions provide information about the accuracy of earlier statements, while subsequent messages provide information about the consistency of these statements. Both allow the public to learn about the leader. Inaccuracy and inconsistency negatively affect evaluations of the leader and reduce support for war. Using a panel survey experiment to test these predictions, we find that public approval is highest when (1) the leader initially predicts a short conflict and (2) when initial predictions prove accurate. The results reveal an intertemporal tradeoff for leaders. Predicting a short conflict is optimal for mobilizing support but potentially suboptimal for retaining that support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00208833
Volume :
62
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Studies Quarterly
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130886322
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx062