Amide proton transfer imaging seems to provide higher diagnostic performance in post-treatment high-grade gliomas than methionine positron emission tomography.

<bold>Objectives: </bold>To compare the diagnostic performance of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging and 11-C methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) for in vivo molecular imaging of protein metabolism in post-treatment gliomas.<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>This study included 43 patients (12 low and 31 high grade) with post-treatment gliomas who underwent both APT and MET-PET imaging within 3 weeks. APT-weighted voxel values and semi-quantitative tumour-to-normal ratios (TNR) were obtained from tumour portions. The voxel-wise relationships between TNR and APT were assessed. The diagnostic performance for recurrence of high-grade gliomas was calculated, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with maximum (TNRmax and APTmax) and 90% histogram values (TNR90 and APT90).<bold>Results: </bold>A moderate positive correlation between TNR and APT was found in low-grade recurrences (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), but not in high-grade ones (r = -0.24, p < 0.001). For distinguishing recurrence in post-treatment high-grade gliomas, APTmax (AUC, 0.88) and APT90 (AUC, 0.78-0.83) had a similar to better diagnostic performance than TNRmax (AUC, 0.71, p = 0.08) or TNR90 (AUC, 0.53-0.59, p = 0.01-0.05).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In post-treatment high-grade gliomas, APT provides different regional information to MET-PET and provides higher diagnostic performance. This difference needs to be considered when using APT or MET-PET as a surrogate marker for tumour protein metabolism.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• APT and TNR values in low-grade recurrence showed a moderate voxel-wise correlation. • APT and TNR demonstrated regional differences in post-treatment high-grade gliomas. • APT90 showed better diagnostic performance than TNR90 in high-grade recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]