Randomised feasibility study of a more liberal haemoglobin trigger for red blood cell transfusion compared to standard practice in anaemic cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.

SUMMARY: Objectives: The primary objective of this feasibility study was to identify quality of life (QoL) scores and symptom scales as tools for measuring patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) associated with haemoglobin level in chemotherapy‐treated cancer patients. Secondary objectives included comparing QoL and symptoms between randomisation arms. Background: Anaemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy is associated with decreased QoL. One treatment option is red blood cell transfusion (RBCT). However, the optimal haemoglobin trigger for transfusion is unknown. Methods: Patients were randomised to a haemoglobin trigger for RBCT of either < 9·7 g dL−1 (arm A) or < lower normal level, female: 11·5 g dL−1, male: 13·1 g dL−1 (arm B). Four PROs were used: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General (FACT‐G) and the FACT‐Anaemia (FACT‐An), a Numeric Rating Scale on symptoms of anaemia and self‐reported Performance Status (PS). The association between haemoglobin and PRO variables was assessed using a linear mixed model with random effects. Results: A total of 133 patients were enrolled, of which 86 patients received RBCT (28 in arm A, 58 in arm B). Baseline questionnaires were filled out in 79·7% of cases. Haemoglobin levels were significantly correlated with FACT‐An, FACT‐An Total Outcome Index (TOI), Functional Well‐Being, fatigue and PS. Improvement on several PRO variables was observed in both arms after RBCT, with clinically minimal important differences observed in FACT‐G, Physical Well‐Being, FACT‐An, FACT‐An TOI, fatigue and dyspnoea. Conclusions: QoL scores of physical and functional domains as well as self‐reported anaemia‐related symptoms correlated well with haemoglobin level in chemotherapy‐treated cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]