Back to Search Start Over

Interviewer-respondent interaction and rapport in PIAAC.

Authors :
Maddox, Bryan
Source :
Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective. 2018, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p182-195. 14p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate small-scale, qualitative observations of interviewer–respondent interaction in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC).Design/methodology/approach The paper uses video-ethnographic methods to document talk and gesture in assessment in Slovenian household settings. It presents an in-depth case study of interaction in a single testing situation.Findings Observing interaction in assessment captures data on assessment performance that is not available in quantitative analysis of assessment response processes. The character of interviewer–respondent interaction and rapport is shaped by the cognitive demands of assessment and the distinctive ecological setting of the household.Research limitations/implications Observational data on assessment response processes and interaction in real-life assessments can be integrated into and synthesized with other sources of “process data”.Practical implications Assessment programs such as PIAAC should consider the significance of the household setting on assessment quality and observations of interaction in assessment as a valid source of paradata.Social implications There is a place for small-scale observational studies of assessment to inform public understanding of assessment quality and validity.Originality/value The paper provides qualitative insights into the significance of interaction and “interviewer effects” in household assessment settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09684883
Volume :
26
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
129668863
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-05-2017-0022