SOLVING SEWER SERVICE: FIGHTING FRAUD WITH TECHNOLOGY.

Fraudulently obtained default judgments ruin lives. Many defendants are ignorant of their cases and therefore do not appear for court. Defendants suffer dire consequences as victims of falsijied service ofprocess. They learn of their lawsuits after their wages are garnished, assets seized, or when their poor credit precludes them from obtaining housing or a new job. For decades, fraudulent service of process has been widespread in high volume court dockets, such as landlord and tenant, debt collection, and small claims matters. Judgments granted to the debt collector plaintiff disproportionately affect low-income communities of color. Some plaintiffs obtained such judgments against defendants who live in mostly black neighborhoods at a rate 18 times higher than it did against defendants in mostly white neighborhoods. Despite this knowledge, the current rules of procedure in most jurisdictions do not require reliable verifications of service. Process servers complete the proof of service themselves, thereby "proving" their service through self-verification. When proof of service relies only on the "honor system, " this is unreliable and unfair, and fails to protect defendants when more reliable technological verifications are available. The integrity of our judicial system is challenged when service-of-process rules fail to use technological verifications to protect litigants from fraud. The current service of process standard requires "notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action. " Since the U.S. Supreme Court articulated this standard in 1950, the circumstances have simply changed. Therefore, so must our service of process requirements. Traditional methods of service, which lack reliable verifications, are not reasonably calculated to provide constitutionally adequate notice. The technological advancements that have occurred in the decades following Mullane, provide new and better circumstances under which notice must be provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]