Back to Search
Start Over
310 Effects of Standardized Ileal Digestible (SID) Threonine: Lysine Ratio on Nursery Pig Performance.
- Source :
-
Journal of Animal Science . Apr2018 Supplement, Vol. 96, p166-167. 2p. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- The objective of this study was to determine the Standardized Ileal Digestible (SID) threonine:lysine ratio on nursery pigs performance under commercial conditions. A total of 2,262 pigs (PIC 359×Camborough®, 5.7 ± 0.1 kg) were used in a 39-d trial. Pens were assigned to dietary treatments in a randomized complete block based on initial BW and room (13 pens/treatment). Lysine was kept below the requirement to ensure that the Thr:Lys ratio was not underestimated (1.30, 1.30, 1.25, and 1.15% SID Lys for 5.7 to 6.4, 6.4 to 9.1, 9.1 to 12.2, and 12.2 to 18.8 kg, respectively). Dietary treatments were 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, and 68% SID Thr:Lys and were fed throughout the entire study. The levels of zinc oxide in the first and second diet were 1600 and 800 mg/kg, respectively. Diet analysis matched formulated values. Data was analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were used to evaluate the dose response effect. BW and room were considered random effects in the models. The NLMIXED procedure was used to evaluate competing models: linear (LN), quadratic polynomial (QP), broken-line linear (BLL), and broken-line quadratic (BLQ). From 0 to 21 d, ADG and G:F increased (linear, <italic>P =</italic> 0.016) with the increase in SID Thr:Lys, whereas ADFI and BW were not statistically affected (<italic>P =</italic> 0.236). From d 21 to 39, G:F increased (quadratic, <italic>P =</italic> 0.006) with the increase in SID Thr:Lys. However, ADG, ADFI, and BW were not statistically different (<italic>P =</italic> 0.179) between treatments. Overall, G:F increased significantly (quadratic, <italic>P =</italic> 0.001) and ADG was not statistically different (<italic>P =</italic> 0.103) as SID Thr:Lys increased, whereas ADFI was not statistically different (<italic>P =</italic> 0.236). Based on the dose-response estimation models with the best fit, the levels that maximized performance were >68% for ADG [LN; (ADG=0.64686 + 0.0014932×SID Thr:Lys)/2.2046] and 65% for G:F [QP; G:F=1/(3.56512–0.0661676×SID Thr:Lys+0.0005089×(SID Thr:Lys)2)]. In conclusion, formulating diets to 65% SID Thr:Lys should maximize G:F while capturing 99.4% of ADG. SID Threonine:Lysine SEM 53 56 59 62 65 68 d 0 to 39 ADGa, g 327 336 331 340 331 345 10.4 ADFI, g 490 481 476 481 472 485 16.8 G:Fb 0.667 0.685 0.694 0.699 0.699 0.699 0.008 BW, kg d 0 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 0.13 d 39 18.5 18.7 18.7 19 18.6 19.1 0.45 aLinear,P=0.103. bQuadratic, <italic>P=</italic>0.001. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00218812
- Volume :
- 96
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 129005212
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky073.307