2005 ve 2017 Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programlarının Öğrenme Alanı, Kazanım, Kavram, Değer ve Beceri Boyutları Açısından Karşılaştırılması.

Basics of the lessons, those are taught in our education system in the schools are the related lesson's curriculum. To sum up the curriculum, it can be said that it is a guideline of answers of questions that are desired to be taught for a lesson like; (what) why, how, who and when should we teach. Essential components which are subject to this curriculum are; the general terms of education, purpose of the lesson, vision of the lesson, main approach of the lesson or the philosophy of the lesson, content of the lesson and its acquisitions, method and techniques that can be used in the lesson and teaching approaches and measurement and evaluation. Besides those main components, it can be witnessed that value that is predicted to be gained with the classification of the learning field (theme) about the particular lesson and the ability and concepts are the parts of this curriculum. The curriculum is the essential resource for the teacher because the teacher is obliged to prepare his daily and annual lecture programme according to this programme. Furthermore, the teacher can complete the missing information that he acquired during the induction programme or the changing content for later, and by this education, programme teacher can complete the information that is related to the various situations. In our country, curriculums are prepared by Ministry of National Education and serviced to the teachers. Social studies is a lesson that is taught at the level of elementary and secondary school. In a narrow range, first content that is imputed to the social studies curriculum that is created in 1965 had been taught under different lesson names both before and after the particular date. Since from the social studies curriculum that is fixed in 1998 till today, the name of the lesson has not changed. However, changes in the individual, social, political and technological etc. needs and developments, Ministry of National Education has gone reformation on social studies curriculum after 1998, on 2005 and 2017. Furthermore, Ministry of National Education, after the program that is fixed on 2005, had increased the branches of social studies which constitutes the social studies lectured contents and had accepted an interdisciplinary approach. The purpose of this research is to compare the dimension of concept and accusation, theme, ability and value in the social studies education programs that are created in 2005 and 2017. In this qualitatively structured research, a method of document review is used. Purposed sampling that is used in this research, on the direction of the purpose of the research, Ministry of National Education's documents that are inspected for t he l ast two social studies curriculums are constituted. Besides, for supporting the data of this research, guidebooks for social studies teachers that are published by various publishing houses are imposed on. Each item has been evaluated separately by using descriptive analysis technique in this research. As a result of this research, in the 2005 Social Studies curriculum, two learning areas were removed. Apart from the addition of a learning field called "Effective Citizenship" which includes the acquisitions of these learning areas added in the 2017 curriculum, there is no significant difference in the theme dimension between the two curriculums. While 15 basic abilities taking part in the social studies curriculum which are fixed on 2005, 26 basic abilities have taken part in the program which are fixed on 2017. While evaluating the value perspective of 2005-fixed social studies curriculum has 20 pieces of values, the social studies curriculum which is fixed on 2017 has 18 values. While in 2005 social studies curriculum place of concept teaching and basic concepts that is predicted to be gained is clearly stated, on the other hand in 2017 social studies curriculum, importance of concept teaching is described with few paragraphs. While in 2007 program clear decrease in the number of acquisition is observable there are no observable structural changes on the perspective of the content. While 174 acquisitions are held on 2005 fixed social studies curriculum, on 2017 social studies curriculum there are 132 acquisitions are maintained. In addition, despite the fact that in the 2005 social studies curriculum there were 7 acquisitions about Kemalism, 2017 Social studies curriculum includes only one acquisition. The real success of the curriculums is revealed only by the reflection of the practice. Therefore, other researchers can examine the extent to which practitioners can apply the scale of acquisition, concept, value and skill in the classroom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]