Back to Search Start Over

Gas-liquid two-phase flow measurements by the electromagnetic flowmeter combined with a phase-isolation method.

Authors :
Yang, Yang
Wang, Dong
Niu, Pengman
Liu, Ming
Wang, Shuai
Source :
Flow Measurement & Instrumentation. Apr2018, Vol. 60, p78-87. 10p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The electromagnetic flowmeter has presented excellent performance in single-phase flow. However, there are many fundamental difficulties when it is applied in two-phase flow. The presence of the insulating phase at various positions in two-phase flow strongly influences the distribution of the weight function, consequently resulting in the uncertainty and instability of the electromagnetic flowmeter's output. When the insulating phase contact with the electrode, it even leads to wrong alarm. In this paper, at the upstream of the electromagnetic flowmeter a phase-isolation method was used to change the inlet flow pattern into a uniform and symmetrical swirling core-annular flow, in which gas-liquid mixture was isolated to gas core and liquid annular flows flowing concurrently in the transmission pipe with a clear smooth interface between them. Then we analysed the behavior of the electromagnetic flowmeter performed in this specific flow pattern, and built the liquid flow rate measurement model. Besides, the void fraction was measured by image processing technique. Owing to the clear smooth interface, the difficulty of image processing and the measurement error of the void fraction can be reduced. The experimental results showed that, the combination of the phase-isolation method could improve the measurement accuracy and successfully make the electromagnetic flowmeter available for the gas-liquid two-phase flow where the original phase distribution is not uniform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09555986
Volume :
60
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Flow Measurement & Instrumentation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128803998
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.02.002