Back to Search Start Over

Investigation of previously implicated genetic variants in chronic tic disorders: a transmission disequilibrium test approach.

Authors :
Abdulkadir, Mohamed
Londono, Douglas
Gordon, Derek
Fernandez, Thomas V.
Brown, Lawrence W.
Cheon, Keun-Ah
Coffey, Barbara J.
Elzerman, Lonneke
Fremer, Carolin
Fründt, Odette
Garcia-Delgar, Blanca
Gilbert, Donald L.
Grice, Dorothy E.
Hedderly, Tammy
Heyman, Isobel
Hong, Hyun Ju
Huyser, Chaim
Ibanez-Gomez, Laura
Jakubovski, Ewgeni
Kim, Young Key
Source :
European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience. Apr2018, Vol. 268 Issue 3, p301-316. 16p. 4 Charts.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Genetic studies in Tourette syndrome (TS) are characterized by scattered and poorly replicated findings. We aimed to replicate findings from candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our cohort included 465 probands with chronic tic disorder (93% TS) and both parents from 412 families (some probands were siblings). We assessed 75 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 465 parent-child trios; 117 additional SNPs in 211 trios; and 4 additional SNPs in 254 trios. We performed SNP and gene-based transmission disequilibrium tests and compared nominally significant SNP results with those from a large independent case-control cohort. After quality control 71 SNPs were available in 371 trios; 112 SNPs in 179 trios; and 3 SNPs in 192 trios. 17 were candidate SNPs implicated in TS and 2 were implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD); 142 were tagging SNPs from eight monoamine neurotransmitter-related genes (including dopamine and serotonin); 10 were top SNPs from TS GWAS; and 13 top SNPs from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, OCD, or ASD GWAS. None of the SNPs or genes reached significance after adjustment for multiple testing. We observed nominal significance for the candidate SNPs rs3744161 (<italic>TBCD</italic>) and rs4565946 (<italic>TPH2</italic>) and for five tagging SNPs; none of these showed significance in the independent cohort. Also, <italic>SLC1A1</italic> in our gene-based analysis and two TS GWAS SNPs showed nominal significance, rs11603305 (intergenic) and rs621942 (<italic>PICALM</italic>). We found no convincing support for previously implicated genetic polymorphisms. Targeted re-sequencing should fully appreciate the relevance of candidate genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09401334
Volume :
268
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128598040
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0808-8