Back to Search Start Over

Rural‐urban disparity in oral health‐related quality of life.

Authors :
Gaber, Amal
Galarneau, Chantal
Feine, Jocelyne S.
Emami, Elham
Source :
Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology. Apr2018, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p132-142. 11p. 5 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this population‐based cross‐sectional study was to estimate rural‐urban disparity in the oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) of the Quebec adult population. Methods: A 2‐stage sampling design was used to collect data from the 1788 parents/caregivers of schoolchildren living in the 8 regions of the province of Quebec in Canada. Andersen's behavioural model for health services utilization was used as a conceptual framework. Place of residency was defined according to the Statistics Canada Census Metropolitan Area and Census Agglomeration Influenced Zone classification. The outcome of interest was OHRQoL measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)‐14 validated questionnaire. Data weighting was applied, and the prevalence, extent and severity of negative oral health impacts were calculated. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of poor oral health‐related quality life (OHRQoL) was statistically higher in rural areas than in urban zones (<italic>P</italic> = .02). Rural residents reported a significantly higher prevalence of negative daily‐life impacts in <italic>pain</italic>,<italic> psychological discomfort</italic> and <italic>social disability </italic>OHIP domains (<italic>P</italic> < .05). Additionally, the rural population showed a greater number of negative oral health impacts (<italic>P</italic> = .03). There was no significant rural‐urban difference in the severity of poor oral health. Logistic regression indicated that the prevalence of poor OHRQoL was significantly related to place of residency (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1‐2.5; <italic>P</italic> = .022), perceived oral health (OR = 9.4; 95% CI = 5.7‐15.5; <italic>P</italic> < .001), dental treatment needs factors (perceived need for dental treatment, pain, dental care seeking) (OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 4.8‐15.6; <italic>P</italic> < .001) and education (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.8‐3.9; <italic>P</italic> < .001). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest a potential difference in OHRQoL of Quebec rural and urban populations, and a need to develop strategies to promote oral health outcomes, specifically for rural residents. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03015661
Volume :
46
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128332186
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12344