Back to Search Start Over

Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors :
Lee, Joo Myung
Rhee, Tae-Min
Hahn, Joo-Yong
Kim, Hyun Kuk
Park, Jonghanne
Hwang, Doyeon
Choi, Ki Hong
Kim, Jihoon
Park, Taek Kyu
Yang, Jeong Hoon
Song, Young Bin
Choi, Jin-Ho
Choi, Seung-Hyuk
Koo, Bon-Kwon
Kim, Young Jo
Chae, Shung Chull
Cho, Myeong Chan
Kim, Chong Jin
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Kim, Ju Han
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Feb2018, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p844-856. 13p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Recent trials demonstrated a benefit of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) stenosis over IRA-only PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) multivessel disease. However, evidence is limited in patients with cardiogenic shock.<bold>Objectives: </bold>This study investigated the prognostic impact of multivessel PCI in patients with STEMI multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock, using the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institutes of Health) registry.<bold>Methods: </bold>Among 13,104 consecutive patients enrolled in the KAMIR-NIH registry, we selected patients with STEMI with multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock and who underwent primary PCI. Primary outcome was 1-year all-cause death, and secondary outcomes included patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization) and its individual components.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 659 patients were treated by multivessel PCI (n = 260) or IRA-only PCI (n = 399) strategy. The risk of all-cause death and non-IRA repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the multivessel PCI group than in the IRA-only PCI group (21.3% vs. 31.7%; hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.43 to 0.82; p = 0.001; and 6.7% vs. 8.2%; hazard ratio: 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.90; p = 0.028, respectively). Results were consistent after multivariable regression, propensity-score matching, and inverse probability weighting to adjust for baseline differences. In a multivariable model, multivessel PCI was independently associated with reduced risk of 1-year all-cause death and patient-oriented composite outcome.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Of patients with STEMI and multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death and non-IRA repeat revascularization. Our data suggest that multivessel PCI for complete revascularization is a reasonable strategy to improve outcomes in patients with STEMI with cardiogenic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
71
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128202933
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.028