Back to Search Start Over

Physician, Interrupted: Workflow Interruptions and Patient Care in the Emergency Department.

Authors :
Blocker, Renaldo C.
Heaton, Heather A.
Forsyth, Katherine L.
Hawthorne, Hunter J.
El-Sherif, Nibras
Bellolio, M. Fernanda
Nestler, David M.
Hellmich, Thomas R.
Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
Hallbeck, M. Susan
Source :
Journal of Emergency Medicine (0736-4679). Dec2017, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p798-804. 7p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>It is unclear how workflow interruptions impact emergency physicians at the point of care.<bold>Objectives: </bold>Our study aimed to evaluate interruption characteristics experienced by academic emergency physicians.<bold>Methods: </bold>This prospective, observational study collected interruptions during attending physician shifts. An interruption is defined as any break in performance of a human activity that briefly requires attention. One observer captured interruptions using a validated tablet PC-based tool that time stamped and categorized the data. Data collected included: 1) type, 2) priority of interruption to original task, and 3) physical location of the interruption. A Kruskal-Wallis H test compared interruption priority and duration. A chi-squared analysis examined the priority of interruptions in and outside of the patient rooms.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 2355 interruptions were identified across 210 clinical hours and 28 shifts (means = 84.1 interruptions per shift, standard deviation = 14.5; means = 11.21 interruptions per hour, standard deviation = 4.45). Physicians experienced face-to-face physician interruptions most frequently (26.0%), followed by face-to-face nurse communication (21.7%), and environment (20.8%). There was a statistically significant difference in interruption duration based on the interruption priority, χ2(2) = 643.98, p < 0.001, where durations increased as priority increased. Whereas medium/normal interruptions accounted for 53.6% of the total interruptions, 53% of the interruptions that occurred in the patient room (n = 162/308) were considered low priority (χ2 [2, n = 2355] = 78.43, p < 0.001).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Our study examined interruptions over entire provider shifts and identified patient rooms as high risk for low-priority interruptions. Targeting provider-centered interventions to patient rooms may aid in mitigating the impacts of interruptions on patient safety and enhancing clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07364679
Volume :
53
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Emergency Medicine (0736-4679)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126945237
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.067