Back to Search Start Over

Detection of Typhoidal and Paratyphoidal Salmonella in Blood by Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Authors :
Tennant, Sharon M.
Toema, Deanna
Qamar, Farah
Iqbal, Najeeha
Boyd, Mary Adetinuke
Marshall, Joanna M.
Blackwelder, William C.
Yukun Wu
Quadri, Farheen
Khan, Asia
Aziz, Fatima
Ahmad, Kumail
Kalam, Adil
Asif, Ehtisham
Qureshi, Shahida
Khan, Erum
Zaidi, Anita K.
Levine, Myron M.
Source :
Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015 Supplement 4, Vol. 61, pS241-S250. 10p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background. The gold standard for diagnosis of enteric fever caused by Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi A or B is bone marrow culture. However, because bone marrow aspiration is highly invasive, many hospitals and large health centers perform blood culture instead. As blood culture has several limitations, there is a need for novel typhoid diagnostics with improved sensitivity and more rapid time to detection. Methods. We developed a clyA-based real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method to detect Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A simultaneously in blood. The sensitivity and specificity of this probeset was first evaluated in vitro in the laboratory and then in a typhoid-endemic population, in Karachi, Pakistan, and in healthy US volunteers. Results. We optimized a DNA extraction and real-time PCR-based method that could reliably detect 1 colony-forming unit/mL of Salmonella Typhi. The probe set was able to detect clinical Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A strains and also diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, but not invasive E. coli or other invasive bacteria. In the field, the clyA qPCR diagnostic was 40% as sensitive as blood culture. However, when qPCR-positive specimens were considered to be true positives, blood culture only exhibited 28.57% sensitivity. Specificity was ≥90% for all comparisons and in the healthy US volunteers. qPCR was significantly faster than blood culture in terms of detection of typhoid and paratyphoid. Conclusions. Based on lessons learned, we recommend that future field trials of this and other novel diagnostics that detect typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella employ multiple methodologies to define a “positive” sample. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10584838
Volume :
61
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126727178
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ726