Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of online, hands-on, and a combined approach for teaching cautery disbudding technique to dairy producers.

Authors :
Winder, Charlotte B.
LeBlanc, Stephen J.
Haley, Derek B.
Lissemore, Kerry D.
Godkin, M. Ann
Duffield, Todd F.
Source :
Journal of Dairy Science. Jan2018, Vol. 101 Issue 1, p840-849. 10p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The use of pain control for disbudding and dehorning is important from both an animal and industry perspective. Best practices include the use of local anesthetic, commonly given as a cornual nerve block (CNB), and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The proportion is decreasing, but many dairy producers do not use local anesthesia, perhaps in part due to lack of knowledge of the CNB technique. Although this skill is typically learned in person from a veterinarian, alternative methods may be useful. The objective of this trial was to determine if there were differences in the efficacy of online training (n = 23), hands-on training (n = 20), and a combined approach (n = 23) for teaching producers to successfully administer a CNB and disbud a calf. The primary outcome was block efficacy, defined as a lack of established pain behaviors during iron application. Secondary outcomes were background knowledge (assessed by a written quiz), CNB and disbudding technique (evaluated by rubric scoring), time taken, and self-confidence before and after evaluation. Associations between training group and outcome were assessed with logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, and Cox-proportional hazard models, with a random effect for workshop. Block efficacy was not different between training groups, with 91% successful in both combined and online groups, and 75% in the hands-on trained group. Online learners had poorer technical scores than hands-on trainees. The combined group was not different from hands-on. Time to block completion tended to be longer for the online group (62 ± 11 s), whereas time to disbudding completion was not different between hands-on (41 ± 5 s) or combined trainees (41 ± 5 s). The combined group had the highest pre-evaluation confidence score, and remained higher after evaluation than online but was not different than hands-on. Although we saw some statistical differences between groups, absolute differences were small and block efficacy was similar. This suggests online training can be a useful tool for motivated producers who lack access to hands-on training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00220302
Volume :
101
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Dairy Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126613438
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13217