Back to Search Start Over

Review the ‘peer review’.

Authors :
Blockeel, Christophe
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
Tournaye, Herman
García-Velasco, Juan Antonio
Source :
Reproductive BioMedicine Online (Elsevier Science). Dec2017, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p747-749. 3p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Peer review has been the main form of appraisal of scientific knowledge for over a century. In essence, this process involves the evaluation of a scientific finding by independent experts prior to its dissemination to the scientific community, in an attempt to ensure that both the research and conclusions meet the necessary standards regarding quality, accuracy, relevance and novelty. However, although ‘peer review’ is considered the current gold standard, it is far from perfect. A focus on the methodology of an article and reviewers' training are key messages for the scientific community. Guidelines on how to review an article are needed and may help reviewers deal with this difficult process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726483
Volume :
35
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Reproductive BioMedicine Online (Elsevier Science)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126210610
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.017