Back to Search Start Over

Improved sensitivity for W-band Gd(III)-Gd(III) and nitroxide-nitroxide DEER measurements with shaped pulses.

Authors :
Bahrenberg, Thorsten
Rosenski, Yael
Carmieli, Raanan
Zibzener, Koby
Qi, Mian
Frydman, Veronica
Godt, Adelheid
Goldfarb, Daniella
Feintuch, Akiva
Source :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance. Oct2017, Vol. 283, p1-13. 13p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Chirp and shaped pulses have been recently shown to be highly advantageous for improving sensitivity in DEER (double electron–electron resonance, also called PELDOR) measurements due to their large excitation bandwidth. The implementation of such pulses for pulse EPR has become feasible due to the availability of arbitrary waveform generators (AWG) with high sampling rates to support pulse shaping for pulses with tens of nanoseconds duration. Here we present a setup for obtaining chirp pulses on our home-built W-band (95 GHz) spectrometer and demonstrate its performance on Gd(III)-Gd(III) and nitroxide-nitroxide DEER measurements. We carried out an extensive optimization procedure on two model systems, Gd(III)-PyMTA–spacer–Gd(III)-PyMTA (Gd-PyMTA ruler; zero-field splitting parameter (ZFS) D ∼ 1150 MHz) as well as nitroxide–spacer–nitroxide (nitroxide ruler) to evaluate the applicability of shaped pulses to Gd(III) complexes and nitroxides, which are two important classes of spin labels used in modern DEER/EPR experiments. We applied our findings to ubiquitin, doubly labeled with Gd-DOTA-monoamide ( D ∼ 550 MHz) as a model for a system with a small ZFS. Our experiments were focused on the questions (i) what are the best conditions for positioning of the detection frequency, (ii) which pump pulse parameters (bandwidth, positioning in the spectrum, length) yield the best signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvements when compared to classical DEER, and (iii) how do the sample’s spectral parameters influence the experiment. For the nitroxide ruler, we report an improvement of up to 1.9 in total SNR, while for the Gd-PyMTA ruler the improvement was 3.1–3.4 and for Gd-DOTA-monoamide labeled ubiquitin it was a factor of 1.8. Whereas for the Gd-PyMTA ruler the two setups pump on maximum and observe on maximum gave about the same improvement, for Gd-DOTA-monoamide a significant difference was found. In general the choice of the best set of parameters depends on the D parameter of the Gd(III) complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10907807
Volume :
283
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
125546840
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.08.003