Brain functional connectivity differentiates dexmedetomidine from propofol and natural sleep.

<bold>Background: </bold>We used functional connectivity measures from brain resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify human neural correlates of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol and their similarities with natural sleep.<bold>Methods: </bold>Connectivity within the resting state networks that are proposed to sustain consciousness generation was compared between deep non-rapid-eye-movement (N3) sleep, dexmedetomidine sedation, and propofol sedation in volunteers who became unresponsive to verbal command. A newly acquired dexmedetomidine dataset was compared with our previously published propofol and N3 sleep datasets.<bold>Results: </bold>In all three unresponsive states (dexmedetomidine sedation, propofol sedation, and N3 sleep), within-network functional connectivity, including thalamic functional connectivity in the higher-order (default mode, executive control, and salience) networks, was significantly reduced as compared with the wake state. Thalamic functional connectivity was not reduced for unresponsive states within lower-order (auditory, sensorimotor, and visual) networks. Voxel-wise statistical comparisons between the different unresponsive states revealed that thalamic functional connectivity with the medial prefrontal/anterior cingulate cortex and with the mesopontine area was reduced least during dexmedetomidine-induced unresponsiveness and most during propofol-induced unresponsiveness. The reduction seen during N3 sleep was intermediate between those of dexmedetomidine and propofol.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Thalamic connectivity with key nodes of arousal and saliency detection networks was relatively preserved during N3 sleep and dexmedetomidine-induced unresponsiveness as compared to propofol. These network effects may explain the rapid recovery of oriented responsiveness to external stimulation seen under dexmedetomidine sedation.<bold>Trial Registry Number: </bold>Committee number: 'Comité d'Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège' (707); EudraCT number: 2012-003562-40; internal reference: 20121/135; accepted on August 31, 2012; Chair: Prof G. Rorive. As it was considered a phase I clinical trial, this protocol does not appear on the EudraCT public website. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]