Back to Search Start Over

First-line icotinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (CONVINCE): a phase 3, open-label, randomized study.

Authors :
Shi, Y. K.
Wang, L.
Han, B. H.
Li, W.
Yu, P.
Liu, Y. P.
Ding, C. M.
Song, X.
Ma, Z. Y.
Ren, X. L.
Feng, J. F.
Zhang, H. L.
Chen, G. Y.
Han, X. H.
Wu, N.
Yao, C.
Song, Y.
Zhang, S. C.
Song, W.
Liu, X. Q.
Source :
Annals of Oncology. Oct2017, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p2443-2450. 8p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: Icotinib has been previously shown to be non-inferior to gefitinib in non-selected advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients when given as second-or further-line treatment. In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 CONVINCE trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of first-line icotinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed plus pemetrexed maintenance in lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Patients and methods: Eligible participants were adults with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma and exon 19/21 EGFR mutations. Participants were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to receive oral icotinib or 3-week cycle of cisplatin plus pemetrexed for up to four cycles; non-progressive patients after four cycles were maintained with pemetrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent response evaluation committee. Other end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Between January 2013 and August 2014, 296 patients were randomized and 285 patients were treated (148 to icotinib, 137 to chemotherapy). Independent response evaluation committee-assessed PFS was significantly longer in the icotinib group (11.2 versus 7.9months; hazard ratio, 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.87; P=0.006). No significant difference for OS was observed between treatments in the overall population or in EGFR-mutated subgroups (exon 19 Del/21 L858R). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) in the icotinib group were rash (14.8%) and diarrhea (7.4%), compared with nausea (45.9%), vomiting (29.2%) and neutropenia (10.9%) in the chemotherapy group. AEs (79.1% versus 94.2%; P<0.001) and treatment-related AEs (54.1% versus 90.5%; P<0.001) were significantly fewer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: First-line icotinib significantly improves PFS of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutation with a tolerable and manageable safety profile. Icotinib should be considered as a first-line treatment for this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09237534
Volume :
28
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
125448400
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx359