Back to Search Start Over

Optimization of groundwater sampling approach under various hydrogeological conditions using a numerical simulation model.

Authors :
Qi, Shengqi
Hou, Deyi
Luo, Jian
Source :
Journal of Hydrology. Sep2017, Vol. 552, p505-515. 11p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

This study presents a numerical model based on field data to simulate groundwater flow in both the aquifer and the well-bore for the low-flow sampling method and the well-volume sampling method. The numerical model was calibrated to match well with field drawdown, and calculated flow regime in the well was used to predict the variation of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration during the purging period. The model was then used to analyze sampling representativeness and sampling time. Site characteristics, such as aquifer hydraulic conductivity, and sampling choices, such as purging rate and screen length, were found to be significant determinants of sampling representativeness and required sampling time. Results demonstrated that: (1) DO was the most useful water quality indicator in ensuring groundwater sampling representativeness in comparison with turbidity, pH, specific conductance, oxidation reduction potential (ORP) and temperature; (2) it is not necessary to maintain a drawdown of less than 0.1 m when conducting low flow purging. However, a high purging rate in a low permeability aquifer may result in a dramatic decrease in sampling representativeness after an initial peak; (3) the presence of a short screen length may result in greater drawdown and a longer sampling time for low-flow purging. Overall, the present study suggests that this new numerical model is suitable for describing groundwater flow during the sampling process, and can be used to optimize sampling strategies under various hydrogeological conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00221694
Volume :
552
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Hydrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124878189
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.016