Back to Search Start Over

Phase I study of veliparib in combination with gemcitabine.

Authors :
Stoller, Ronald
Schmitz, John
Ding, Fei
Puhalla, Shannon
Belani, Chandra
Appleman, Leonard
Lin, Yan
Jiang, Yixing
Almokadem, Salah
Petro, Daniel
Holleran, Julianne
Kiesel, Brian
Ken Czambel, R.
Carneiro, Benedito
Kontopodis, Emmanuel
Hershberger, Pamela
Rachid, Madani
Chen, Alice
Chu, Edward
Beumer, Jan
Source :
Cancer Chemotherapy & Pharmacology. Sep2017, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p631-643. 13p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Veliparib (ABT-888) is an oral PARP inhibitor expected to increase gemcitabine activity. This phase I determined the maximal tolerable dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib combined with gemcitabine.<bold>Methods: </bold>Patients with advanced solid tumors received veliparib (10-40-mg PO BID) on chemotherapy weeks with gemcitabine 500-750-mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 (28-day cycle), or on days 1 and 8 (21-day cycle). The MTD, DLT, adverse events, PK, and PD were evaluated.<bold>Results: </bold>Eleven patients were enrolled on the 28-day schedule. The 28-day schedule was considered intolerable and amended to a 21-day schedule, with 20 patients enrolled. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were myelosuppression-related. The MTD was determined to be 750-mg/m2 gemcitabine IV on days 1 and 8- and 20-mg PO veliparib BID days 1-14 on a 21-day schedule. Of 27 patients evaluable for response, 3 had PR and 15 had SD. There was no evidence of any major drug-drug interaction, and PK parameter values for veliparib, gemcitabine, and dFdU were as expected. Analysis of PBMCs showed evidence of PARP inhibition and DNA damage associated with therapy.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Gemcitabine at 750-mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 combined with veliparib at a dose of 20-mg PO BID days 1-14 on a 21-day schedule is relatively well-tolerated, with manageable, expected toxicities. Clinical responses were observed in a pretreated population of patients, suggesting that this combination should be further evaluated in the phase II setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03445704
Volume :
80
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer Chemotherapy & Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124846255
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3409-3