Back to Search Start Over

COMPOSITION AND CONCENTRATION OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS OF 'AUKSIS' APPLE GROWN ON VARIOUS ROOTSTOCKS.

Authors :
Kviklys, Darius
Liaudanskas, Mindaugas
Viškelis, Jonas
Buskienė, Loreta
Lanauskas, Juozas
Uselis, Nobertas
Janulis, Valdimaras
Source :
Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B: Natural, Exact & Applied Sciences. Jun2017, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p144-149. 6p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The trial was carried out at the Institute of Horticulture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry in 2013-2015. Cv. 'Auksis' was tested on 12 rootstocks: B.396, B.9, M.9, M.26, P 22, P 59, P 61, P 62, P 66, P 67, PB.4, and Pure 1. Accumulation of phenolic compounds depended on fruit yield and average fruit weight. On average, significantly lower concentration among rootstocks occurred when apple trees had abundant yield and fruits were smaller. On average chlorogenic acid constituted 50% and total procyanidins 28% of total phenols in 'Auksis' fruits. Flavonoid concentration most depended on rootstock and the highest variation was recorded. More than 50% difference occurred between the highest total flavonoid concentration in apples on PB.4 and the lowest on M.9 rootstocks. Low variability of total procyanidin concentration among rootstocks was observed. Differences between the highest and lowest concentration was 15%. Total concentration of phenolic compounds differed among rootstocks by 29-35% depending on the year. Differences in accumulation of phenolic compounds depended on rootstock genotype but not on yield or fruit weight. PB.4 and P 67 rootstocks had the highest, and M.9, P 62 and M.26 had the lowest concentration of total phenol in 'Auksis' fruits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1407009X
Volume :
71
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B: Natural, Exact & Applied Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124826179
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0025