Back to Search Start Over

FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE LOCATION AND MAGNITUDE OF THE HYDRAULIC RESISTANCES IN THE SOIL: PLANT SYSTEM.

Authors :
Faiz, S. M. A.
Weatherley, P. E.
Source :
New Phytologist. Jul78, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p19-28. 11p.
Publication Year :
1978

Abstract

In a previous paper (Faiz and Weatherley, 1977), evidence was put forward for the development of steep gradients of water potential in the soil surrounding the individual roots of rapidly transpiring plants (perirhizal gradients). In this paper, similar experiments are described in which additional data on the dimensions of the root system, distribution of soil water potentials within the rooting zone and the water potentials of the roots themselves were obtained. It was found with experiments on soil that the surface area of the root system was X 60 the cross-sectional area of the pararhizal pathway (cross-sectional area of the pot) through which water moved to the root zone from the water table below. Since the volume rate of flow through the pen- and pararhizal zones was the same, the velocity of movement up to the individual root was therefore only 1/60 of that through the soil supplying the root system. Under conditions of rapid transpiration, the gradient of water potential in that part of the pararhizal pathway immediately beneath the root zone was found to be about 1 bar cm-1. Thus it would be expected that the perirhizal gradient would be 1/60 of this, i.e. it would be negligibly small. However, the actual perirhizal drop in water potential was found to be about 8 bars through a distance of 0.1 cm, i.e. the gradient was 80 bars cm1. Such a steep gradient would require the hydraulic conductivity of the soil in the perirhizal zones to be 4 orders of magnitude lower than that in the pararhizal pathway. An even greater discrepancy was found with fine sand. The soil within the rooting zone had a somewhat lower water content than that in the pararhizal zone, but it is not thought that this, and some other imponderables which are discussed, could account for this enormous discrepancy. It is concluded that in these experiments, measurable perirhizal gradients were unlikely to develop. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0028646X
Volume :
81
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
New Phytologist
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
12347910
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01599.x