First stage of labour management practices: A survey of Australian obstetric providers.

Aims To report on the opinions and reported practices of Australian obstetricians and general practice ( GP) obstetricians, in the definition and management of spontaneous first stage of labour, in low-risk nulliparous women. Materials and methods Cross-sectional survey sent electronically to all Australian Specialist obstetricians ( FRANZCOG) and Diplomates. Respondents answered questions regarding care of nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term across three domains: (i) practitioners' characteristics; (ii) current practice; (iii) opinion regarding joint statement by ACOG/ SMFM (Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine) 'Safe prevention of primary caesarean section'. Results The dataset included responses from 664 participants, representing 29% of Specialists and 11% of Diplomates. Responses varied in the criteria used to define normal labour, and the diagnosis and management of prolonged labour. Clinicians with more post-qualification experience considered the minimal acceptable progress to be faster than those with fewer years of experience ( P = 0.02). Clinicians working in higher acuity hospitals were more likely to augment labour for longer prior to recommending a caesarean section for active phase arrest, compared to those in lower acuity hospitals ( P = 0.025). The majority of respondents (58.2%) already based their practice on the ACOG/ SMFM 'Safe prevention of primary caesarean section' statement, or would now consider changing their practice. Conclusion There is a lack of consensus among Australian obstetricians and GP obstetricians regarding definition of normal progress in first stage of labour and how to manage abnormal progress; however, many are open to new recommendations for practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]