Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of cooling rate on particle rearrangement statistics: Rapidly cooled glasses are more ductile and less reversible.
- Source :
-
Physical Review E . Feb2017, Vol. 95 Issue 2, p1-1. 1p. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Amorphous solids, such as metallic, polymeric, and colloidal glasses, display complex spatiotemporal response to applied deformations. In contrast to crystalline solids, during loading, amorphous solids exhibit a smooth crossover from elastic response to plastic flow. In this study, we investigate the mechanical response of binary Lennard-Jones glasses to athermal, quasistatic pure shear as a function of the cooling rate used to prepare them. We find several key results concerning the connection between strain-induced particle rearrangements and mechanical response. We show that the energy loss per strain dUloss/dγ caused by particle rearrangements for more rapidly cooled glasses is larger than that for slowly cooled glasses. We also find that the cumulative energy loss Uloss can be used to predict the ductility of glasses even in the putative linear regime of stress versus strain. Uloss increases (and the ratio of shear to bulk moduli decreases) with increasing cooling rate, indicating enhanced ductility. In addition, we characterized the degree of reversibility of particle motion during a single shear cycle. We find that irreversible particle motion occurs even in the linear regime of stress versus strain. However, slowly cooled glasses, which undergo smaller rearrangements, are more reversible during a single shear cycle than rapidly cooled glasses. Thus, we show that more ductile glasses are also less reversible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *DUCTILITY
*METALLIC glasses
*AMORPHOUS substances
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 24700045
- Volume :
- 95
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Physical Review E
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 122616441
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022611