A simple alternative formulation for structural optimisation with dynamic and buckling objectives.

Structural topology optimisation has mainly been applied to strength and stiffness objectives, due to the ease of calculating the sensitivities for such problems. In contrast, dynamic and buckling objectives require time consuming central difference schemes, or inefficient non-gradient algorithms, for calculation of the sensitivities. Further, soft-kill algorithms suffer from numerous numerical issues, such as localised artificial modes and mode switching. This has resulted in little focus on structural topology optimisation for dynamic and buckling objectives. In this work it is found that nominal stress contours can be derived from applying the vibration and buckling mode shapes as displacement fields, defined as the dynamic and buckling von Mises stress, respectively. This paper shows that there is an equivalence between the dynamic von Mises stress and the frequency sensitivity numbers for element removal and addition in bidirectional evolutionary structural optimisation. Likewise, it was found that the contours of buckling von Mises stress and buckling sensitivity numbers are analogous; therefore, an equivalence is shown for element removal and addition. The examples demonstrate consistent resulting topologies from the two different formulations for both dynamic and buckling criteria. This article aims to develop a simple alternative, based on visual correlation with a mathematical verification, for topology optimisation with dynamic and buckling criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]