Application of real-time, stroboscopic x-ray diffraction with dynamical mechanical analysis to characterize the motion of ferroelastic domain walls.

The dynamic response of ferroelastic twins to an alternating stress has been studied in situ at high temperature using a stroboscopic x-ray diffractometer and combined dynamical mechanical analyzer (XRD-DMA). The XRD-DMA is designed to allow x-ray rocking curves to be collected while the sample is undergoing simultaneous dynamical mechanical analysis in three-point-bend geometry. The detection of diffracted x-rays is synchronized with the applied load, so that rocking curves corresponding to different parts of the dynamic load cycle can be obtained separately. The technique is applied to single-crystal LaAlO[sub 3], which undergoes a cubic to rhombohedral phase transition at 550 °C, leading to the generation of characteristic “chevron” twins. The rocking-curve topology is calculated as a function of crystal orientation for each chevron type. Systematic changes in the rocking curves during heating and cooling under dynamic load demonstrate a clear preference for chevrons containing {100}[sub pc] walls perpendicular to the sample surface and {110}[sub pc] walls oriented at 45° to the sample surface. These domain walls are oriented favorably with respect to the applied stress (i.e., they separate domains with contrasting components of spontaneous strain parallel to the sample length). Below 200 °C, the superelastic strain is accommodated by rapid advancement/retraction of vertical {100}[sub pc] needle domains, with little effect on the dynamic rocking curves. Above 200 °C, a dynamic shift in peak position between rocking curves measured at the maximum and minimum applied loads is detected. The onset of a dynamic response correlates with the loss of the {100}[sub pc] needle domains and the transformation of the microstructure to 45° {110}[sub pc] walls. Superelastic strain is then accommodated by domain wall displacement/rotation, causing the wall to sweep back and forth across the x-ray beam and diffraction to occur from alternate domains at the maximum and minimum points of the stress cycle. A second sample, oriented so that domain walls in all possible chevrons are unfavorably oriented with respect to the applied stress, shows very different behavior. The rocking curves consist of several well-separated peaks at the minimum load and a single broad diffraction signal at the maximum load. This is caused by the creation of a very high density of twin walls across the sample above a critical applied stress, leading to corrugation of the sample surface. © 2004 American Institute of Physics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]