Back to Search Start Over

Ecological network analysis of embodied particulate matter 2.5 – A case study of Beijing.

Authors :
Yang, Siyuan
Fath, Brian
Chen, Bin
Source :
Applied Energy. Dec2016, Vol. 184, p882-888. 7p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Over the past decades, China has been facing severe airborne pollution associated with atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ). Much attention has been paid to the physical transport of PM 2.5 emissions. However, the embodied emissions, namely the emissions transferred through economic activities, have seldom been investigated. In this paper, embodied emission of PM 2.5 from each sector of Beijing is quantified based on input–output analysis (IOA). Forty-two economic sectors from the input–output table are aggregated into fifteen components. Furthermore, the mutual interactions and control relationship within those sectors have been revealed by using ecological network analysis (ENA) to identify the dominant sectors. The results show that, in 2010, 34% of the total PM 2.5 emissions, or 59.4 kt PM 2.5 , were indirect emissions traded through economic sectors within Beijing. According to the results of ENA, we found that “Smelting & Pressing of Metals“, “Metal Products” and “Nonmetal Mineral Products“ are the top three sectors with the highest control levels while “Agriculture”, “Catering Services” and “Residential Services” are the lowest-ranking sectors among the system. The network confirms that sectors related to heavy industry are the dominant sectors driving the embodied PM 2.5 emissions in the whole system. Compared to the conventional approaches for tracking PM 2.5 emissions, ENA may provide a practical way to reveal the mechanisms of embodied PM 2.5 emission flows via socioeconomic activities from a holistic perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03062619
Volume :
184
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Applied Energy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
119779689
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.087