The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes in Men.

<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate the impact of diabetes and obesity on artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) outcomes.<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>From 1987 to 2011, men with available diabetes and body mass index (BMI) information (568 of 954) undergoing primary AUS placement at our institution were evaluated. The incidence of all-cause reintervention, mechanical failure, atrophy, and erosion or infection was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analyses evaluated the association between clinical characteristics and AUS outcomes.<bold>Results: </bold>In total, 90 (16%) men had diabetes. Median follow-up among alive men without AUS event was 5.9 years. Diabetics had a greater 5-year incidence of erosion/infection (13% vs 8%; P = .025). On multivariable analysis, diabetes was independently associated with an increased risk of erosion/infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.26; P = .02); whereas greater BMI was associated with a reduced risk of erosion or infection (obese: HR = 0.39; P = .02; overweight: HR = 0.57; P = .07). Accordingly, in diabetics, greater average postoperative glucose level (176 mg/dL vs 153 mg/dL; P = .04) and use of nonantibiotic coated devices (13 of 62 vs 1 of 28; P = .035) was associated with a greater incidence of erosion or infection. There was no difference in social continence (≤1 pad/day) (45% vs 57%; P = .29) or high-level satisfaction (95% vs 90%; P = .43) among diabetics vs nondiabetics. However, with greater BMI (<25, 25 to <30, and ≥30), there was a decrease in ≤1 pad/day usage (62% vs 61% vs 49%; P = .02).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>We found that the presence of diabetes was independently associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of AUS erosion or infection. These findings warrant the consideration of additional periprocedural measures to reduce the risk of this devastating complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]