Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle.

MLA

De Vos, Anick, et al. “Cumulative Live Birth Rates after Fresh and Vitrified Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in the First Treatment Cycle.” Human Reproduction, vol. 31, no. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 2442–49. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew219.

APA

De Vos, A., Van Landuyt, L., Santos-Ribeiro, S., Camus, M., Van de Velde, H., Tournaye, H., & Verheyen, G. (2016). Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Human Reproduction, 31(11), 2442–2449. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew219

Chicago

De Vos, Anick, Lisbet Van Landuyt, Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, Michel Camus, Hilde Van de Velde, Herman Tournaye, and Greta Verheyen. 2016. “Cumulative Live Birth Rates after Fresh and Vitrified Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in the First Treatment Cycle.” Human Reproduction 31 (11): 2442–49. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew219.