Back to Search
Start Over
The impact of substituting general practitioners with nurse practitioners on resource use, production and health-care costs during out-of-hours: a quasi- experimental study.
- Source :
-
BMC Family Practice . 9/13/2016, Vol. 17, p1-10. 10p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background: The pressure in out-of-hours primary care is high due to an increasing demand for care and rising health-care costs. During the daytime, substituting general practitioners (GPs) with nurse practitioners (NPs) shows positive results to contribute to these challenges. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the impact during out-of-hours. The current study aims to provide an insight into the impact of substitution on resource use, production and direct health-care costs during out-of-hours. Methods: At a general practitioner cooperative (GPC) in the south-east of the Netherlands, experimental teams with four GPs and one NP were compared with control teams with five GPs. In a secondary analysis, GP care versus NP care was also examined. During a 15-month period all patients visiting the GPC on weekend days were included. The primary outcome was resource use including X-rays, drug prescriptions and referrals to the Emergency Department (ED). We used logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes were production per hour and direct health-care costs using a cost-minimization analysis. Results: We analysed 6,040 patients in the experimental team (NPs: 987, GPs: 5,053) and 6,052 patients in the control team. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the teams. In the secondary analysis, in the experimental team NP care was associated with fewer drug prescriptions (NPs 37.1 %, GPs 43 %, p < .001) and fewer referrals to the ED (NPs 5.1 %, GPs 11.3 %, p = .001) than GP care. The mean production per hour was 3.0 consultations for GPs and 2.4 consultations for NPs (p < .001). The cost of a consultation with an NP was €3.34 less than a consultation with a GP (p = .02). Conclusions: These results indicated no overall differences between the teams. Nonetheless, a comparison of type of provider showed that NP care resulted in lower resource use and cost savings than GP care. To find the optimal balance between GPs and NPs in out-of-hours primary care, more research is needed on the impact of increasing the ratio of NPs in a team with GPs on resource use and health-care costs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01388374. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *CHI-squared test
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*DRUG prescribing
*EVALUATION of medical care
*MEDICAL care use
*MEDICAL care costs
*MEDICAL personnel
*MEDICAL referrals
*NURSE practitioners
*PERSONNEL management
*GENERAL practitioners
*PROBABILITY theory
*REGRESSION analysis
*RESEARCH funding
*T-test (Statistics)
*WAGES
*X-rays
*PHYSICIAN practice patterns
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14712296
- Volume :
- 17
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- BMC Family Practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 118238256
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0528-6