Back to Search Start Over

Source of the tsunami generated by the 1650 AD eruption of Kolumbo submarine volcano (Aegean Sea, Greece).

Authors :
Ulvrova, Martina
Paris, R.
Nomikou, P.
Kelfoun, K.
Leibrandt, S.
Tappin, D.R.
McCoy, F.W.
Source :
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research. Jul2016, Vol. 321, p125-139. 15p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

The 1650 AD explosive eruption of Kolumbo submarine volcano (Aegean Sea, Greece) generated a destructive tsunami. In this paper we propose a source mechanism of this poorly documented tsunami using both geological investigations and numerical simulations. Sedimentary evidence of the 1650 AD tsunami was found along the coast of Santorini Island at maximum altitudes ranging between 3.5 m a.s.l. (Perissa, southern coast) and 20 m a.s.l. (Monolithos, eastern coast), corresponding to a minimum inundation of 360 and 630 m respectively. Tsunami deposits consist of an irregular 5 to 30 cm thick layer of dark grey sand that overlies pumiceous deposits erupted during the Minoan eruption and are found at depths of 30–50 cm below the surface. Composition of the tsunami sand is similar to the composition of the present-day beach sand but differs from the pumiceous gravelly deposits on which it rests. The spatial distribution of the tsunami deposits was compared to available historical records and to the results of numerical simulations of tsunami inundation. Different source mechanisms were tested: earthquakes, underwater explosions, caldera collapse, and pyroclastic flows. The most probable source of the 1650 AD Kolumbo tsunami is a 250 m high water surface displacement generated by underwater explosion with an energy of ~ 2 × 10 16 J at water depths between 20 and 150 m. The tsunamigenic explosion(s) occurred on September 29, 1650 during the transition between submarine and subaerial phases of the eruption. Caldera subsidence is not an efficient tsunami source mechanism as short (and probably unrealistic) collapse durations (< 5 min) are needed. Pyroclastic flows cannot be discarded, but the required flux (10 6 to 10 7 m 3 · s − 1 ) is exceptionally high compared to the magnitude of the eruption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03770273
Volume :
321
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
116404903
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.04.034