Back to Search Start Over

Modelling the cost-effectiveness of adopting risk-stratified approaches to extended screening intervals in the national diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Scotland.

Authors :
Scotland, G.
McKeigue, P.
Philip, S.
Leese, G. P.
Olson, J. A.
Looker, H. C.
Colhoun, H. M.
Javanbakht, M.
Source :
Diabetic Medicine. Jul2016, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p886-895. 10p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Aims To assess the cost-effectiveness of adopting risk-stratified approaches to extended screening intervals in the national diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Scotland. Methods A continuous-time hidden Markov model was fitted to national longitudinal screening data to derive transition probabilities between observed non-referable and referable retinopathy states. These were incorporated in a decision model simulating progression, costs and visual acuity outcomes for a synthetic cohort with a covariate distribution matching that of the Scottish diabetic screening population. The cost-effectiveness of adopting extended (2-year) screening for groups with no observed retinopathy was then assessed over a 30-year time horizon. Results Individuals with a current grade of no retinopathy on two consecutive screening episodes face the lowest risk of progressing to referable disease. For the cohort as a whole, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained for annual vs. biennial screening ranged from approximately £74 000 (for those with no retinopathy and a prior observed grade of mild or observable background retinopathy) to approximately £232 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained (for those with no retinopathy on two consecutive screening episodes). The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in the subgroup with Type 1 diabetes were substantially lower; approximately £22 000 to £85 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. Conclusions Biennial screening for individuals with diabetes who have no retinopathy is likely to deliver significant savings for a very small increase in the risk of adverse visual acuity and quality of life outcomes. There is greater uncertainty regarding the long-term cost-effectiveness of adopting biennial screening in younger people with Type 1 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07423071
Volume :
33
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diabetic Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
116236818
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13129