Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy of i-Factor Bone Graft versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
- Source :
-
Spine (03622436) . 7/1/2016, Vol. 41 Issue 13, p1075-1083. 9p. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- <bold>Study Design: </bold>A prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel, single-blinded noninferiority multicenter pivotal FDA IDE trial.<bold>Objective: </bold>The objective of this study was to investigate efficacy and safety of i-Factor Bone Graft (i-Factor) compared with local autograft in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy.<bold>Summary Of Background Data: </bold>i-Factor is a composite bone substitute material consisting of the P-15 synthetic collagen fragment adsorbed onto anorganic bone mineral and suspended in an inert biocompatible hydrogel carrier. P-15 has demonstrated bone healing efficacy in dental, orthopedic, and nonhuman applications.<bold>Methods: </bold>Patients randomly received either autograft (N = 154) or i-Factor (N = 165) in a cortical ring allograft. Study success was defined as noninferiority in fusion, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Neurological Success endpoints, and similar adverse events profile at 12 months.<bold>Results: </bold>At 12 months (follow-up rate 87%), both i-Factor and autograft subjects demonstrated a high fusion rate (88.97% and 85.82%, respectively, noninferiority P = 0.0004), significant improvements in NDI (28.75 and 27.40, respectively, noninferiority P < 0.0001), and high Neurological Success rate (93.71% and 93.01%, respectively, noninferiority P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the rate of adverse events (83.64% and 82.47% in the i-Factor and autograft groups, respectively, P = 0.8814). Overall success rate consisting of fusion, NDI, Neurological Success and Safety Success was higher in i-Factor subjects than in autograft subjects (68.75% and 56.94%, respectively, P = 0.0382). Improvements in VAS pain and SF-36v2 scores were clinically relevant and similar between the groups. A high proportion of patients reported good or excellent Odom outcomes (81.4% in both groups).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>i-Factor has met all four FDA mandated noninferiority success criteria and has demonstrated safety and efficacy in single-level ACDF for cervical radiculopathy. i-Factor and autograft groups demonstrated significant postsurgical improvement and high fusion rates.<bold>Level Of Evidence: </bold>1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03622436
- Volume :
- 41
- Issue :
- 13
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Spine (03622436)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 116218808
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001466