Back to Search Start Over

Genomic and archaeological evidence suggests a dual origin of domestic dogs.

Authors :
Frantz, Laurent A. F.
Mullin, Victoria E.
Pionnier-Capitan, Maud
Lebrasseur, Ophélie
Ollivier, Morgane
Perri, Angela
Linderholm, Anna
Mattiangeli, Valeria
Teasdale, Matthew D.
Dimopoulos, Evangelos A.
Tresset, Anne
Duffraisse, Marilyne
McCormick, Finbar
Bartosiewicz, László
Gál, Erika
Nyerges, Éva A.
Sablin, Mikhail V.
Bréhard, Stéphanie
Mashkour, Marjan
Bălăşescu, Adrian
Source :
Science. 6/3/2016, Vol. 352 Issue 6290, p1228-1231. 4p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

The geographic and temporal origins of dogs remain controversial. We generated genetic sequences from 59 ancient dogs and a complete (28×) genome of a late Neolithic dog (dated to ~4800 calendar years before the present) from Ireland. Our analyses revealed a deep split separating modern East Asian and Western Eurasian dogs. Surprisingly, the date of this divergence (~14,000 to 6400 years ago) occurs commensurate with, or several millennia after, the first appearance of dogs in Europe and East Asia. Additional analyses of ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA revealed a sharp discontinuity in haplotype frequencies in Europe. Combined, these results suggest that dogs may have been domesticated independently in Eastern and Western Eurasia from distinct wolf populations. East Eurasian dogs were then possibly transported to Europe with people, where they partially replaced European Paleolithic dogs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00368075
Volume :
352
Issue :
6290
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
115909619
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3161