Back to Search Start Over

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983-2012.

Authors :
Gounder, Prabhu P.
Bulkow, Lisa R.
Meltzer, Martin I.
Bruce, Michael G.
Hennessy, Thomas W.
Snowball, Mary
Spradling, Philip R.
Adhikari, Bishwa B.
McMahon, Brian J.
Source :
Circumpolar Health Supplements. 2016, Vol. 75, p1-9. 9p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ]40 years and Asian females aged ]50 years. Objective. To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP → US). Design. A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983--2012. We assumed that compared with AFP 0US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. Results. The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP 0US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP → US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP 0US and $41,000 per extra YLG. Conclusions. Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP 0US, the reduced costs of the AFP 0US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17972361
Volume :
75
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Circumpolar Health Supplements
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
115883378
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115