RESISTÊNCIA DE UNIÃO DE ADESIVOS ALL-IN-ONE EM DIFERENTES SUBSTRATOS.

Introduction: the adhesive dentistry had its beginning in the enamel etching. With the rapid development of new products, in vitro tests have become valuable to compare the UK adhesives to enamel, dentin and other substrates - in immediate or long-term analyzes to evaluate the bond durability. Objective: to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of all-in-one adhesives on different substrates after a week storage in distilled water. Methodology: seventy five bovine incisors were used and obtained 25 samples of uncut enamel/UE; 25 of cut enamel/CE; 25 of dentin/DE; more 25 of Filtek Z350XT/ XT. Five adhesives were applied, and divided into 5 groups (n=5): [1]37% phosphoric acid + Single Bond 2/SB adhesive control; [2] BeautiBond/BB; [3]Bond Force/BF; [4]One SE/SE; [5]Single Bond Universal/UN. Four Tygon tubings were positioned on the substrates and filled in with Filtek Z350 XT Flow. After 20s VLC, the tubes were removed to expose 4 specimens for each sample (20 cylinders per group). After a week in distilled water 37°C, the specimens were tested in an universal testing machine. The tensile load resulting in shear was performed on the basis of the cylinder at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were expressed in MPa and analyzed by Anova (p<0,001) and Tukey test (p<0.05). Results: comparing each substrate, there was no difference for the UE and the CE. To dentin, the SE and the UN resulted in higher SBS. For the composite substrate, the higher SBS was observed in UN. Comparing the substrates, the SBS was lower to some adhesives in UE and DE. Conclusion: the all-in-one adhesives are substrate-dependents. The highest SBS was obtained for the UN in the composite substrate, and lowest SBS mean to BF in dentin substrate. The SBS in CE and XT was more stable, when compared to other substrates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]