Back to Search Start Over

Biodegradable Polymer-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Differing Elution and Absorption Kinetics: The PANDA III Trial.

Authors :
Xu, Bo
Gao, Runlin
Yang, Yuejin
Cao, Xuebin
Qin, Lei
Li, Yi
Li, Zhanquan
Li, Xueqi
Lin, Hailong
Guo, Yong
Ma, Yitong
Wang, Jian’an
Nie, Shaoping
Xu, Liang
Cao, Eric
Guan, Changdong
Stone, Gregg W.
Wang, Jian'an
PANDA III Investigators
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). May2016, Vol. 67 Issue 19, p2249-2258. 10p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Whether the rate of drug elution and polymer absorption affects clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown. The widely used polylactide polymer-based Excel stent (JW Medical, Weihai, China) elutes sirolimus within 180 days, and the polylactide polymer is completely absorbed within 6 to 9 months. In contrast, the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer-based BuMA stent (Sino Medical, Tianjin, China) elutes sirolimus within 30 days, and the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer is completely absorbed within 3 months. Thus, both metallic DES elute sirolimus, isolating major differences to the polymer and elution kinetics.<bold>Objectives: </bold>The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness between the BuMA sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and Excel SES in an "all-comers" population.<bold>Methods: </bold>PANDA III was a multicenter trial with few exclusion criteria, powered for sequential noninferiority and superiority testing. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization.<bold>Results: </bold>Between December 2013 and August 2014, 2,348 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with BuMA (n = 1,174) or Excel SES (n = 1,174). The 1-year primary endpoint of TLF occurred in 6.4% of patients in each group (difference: 0.06%; 95% confidence interval: 1.93% to 2.04%; pnoninferiority = 0.0003; psuperiority = 0.95). There were no significant between-group differences in any of the secondary endpoints other than the incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis, which occurred less frequently with the BuMA stent (0.5% vs. 1.3%; log-rank p = 0.048).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The BuMA SES was demonstrated to be noninferior to the Excel SES for 1-year TLF, with a lower incidence of stent thrombosis. (Comparison of BuMA eG Based BioDegradable Polymer Stent With EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent in "Real-World" Practice [PANDA-III]; NCT02017275). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
67
Issue :
19
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
115067823
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.475